Scholarship@UMass Lowell

Fourth Estate or Mouthpiece? A Formal Model of Media, Protest, and Government Repression

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Whitten-Woodring, Jenifer
dc.contributor.author James, Patrick
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-28T13:01:38Z
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-19T21:16:01Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-28T13:01:38Z
dc.date.available 2020-02-19T21:16:01Z
dc.date.issued 2012-04-26
dc.identifier.citation Political Communication (2012) 29:2, 113-136 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1091-7675 (online)
dc.identifier.issn 1058-4609 (print)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11318/132
dc.description.abstract New media dramatically increase citizens’ access to information and decrease governments’ ability to control the flow of communication. Although human rights nongovernmental organizations have advocated that access to independent news media will improve government respect for human rights, recent empirical studies have shown this is not always the case. We posit that media independence and the presence or absence of democratic characteristics, in particular political competition, have substantial effects on government repression because these factors determine the degree to which the government is vulnerable to public pressures. The model developed here includes three equations that encompass the impact of interaction between and among the news media, citizens, and government. The first equation specifies the influences on the news media’s decision whether or not to perform a “watchdog” role regarding government repression. The second equation represents public reaction to the news media’s coverage of government repression (i.e., protest). Here access to news media via traditional and new media is an important factor. The third equation represents government repression. Solutions to the system of equations are derived for four scenarios (a) Democracy and media independence are both present, (b) democracy is present but media independence is absent, (c) democracy is absent (autocracy) and media independence is present, and (d) democracy is absent (autocracy) and media independence is absent. We then consider interesting properties of the anticipated behavior from the government, media, and general public through case illustrations for the Netherlands and Myanmar/Burma. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Routledge en_US
dc.subject media en_US
dc.subject human rights en_US
dc.subject democracy en_US
dc.subject protest en_US
dc.subject repression en_US
dc.title Fourth Estate or Mouthpiece? A Formal Model of Media, Protest, and Government Repression en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account